Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pipes Now that has to be a special moment,
Slurrey u actually loses the match but yet gets to protest because of an uneligible player. Which turns out to be a misundestanding or miscommunication within the league. Now let's turn the table. Appreciate this for what it is and take your lumps like men and accept the fact that you were not the better team on this day and allow victoria to move forward. No way !! For the fact that you could not accept that you lost in the first place.
Most teams are aware that surrey U are a force to be reckoned with but it is results like this that will question their character. Enjoy your second chance!!Even if you lose again you may hopefully find a reason to move on!!
Pipes
Peg/oldboy forever |
Spare us the holier than thou morality play...who's to say what impact the ineligible player may have had in the game? Fact is, when you win with an ineligible player your team performance/win is tainted...it ain't squeeky clean.
Mudsling all you want...once again, that is the harsh consequence that punishes teams that play ineligible players...if you are saying any challenge to a result with an illegal player is somehow dishonourable then there's a long list of players and teams that you might want to slag.
Since you've been playing forever are you sure you and some of your oldboys wouldn't be on that list?
