TTP Community - View Single Post

SC · 05-06-2005, 09:06 AM

Premier players are not supposed to be in the tourney at all. I didn't see any, but there sure were a lot of Premier B teams

.

The tourney had a new director this year. So I think it was another building year to get to know the teams. No offense to Squamish, but they aren't up to snuff with the lower mainland scene, so they don't know the teams (divisions). Perhaps they might re-format next year to even things up. Having said that, they did turn away some womens teams this year, possibly due to not enough fields

I agree with the complaint about going overboard on the score, it's not the other teams fault that they were shoved into your category. However, I'm not sure what it's like to be shalacked (on the losing side of things).

05-06-2005, 09:06 AM	#12 (permalink)
SC Member Joined: Jul 2001 Location: On the fence. Posts: 3,011 TTP Friends: (3)	Re: 2005 Squamish Tournament Premier players are not supposed to be in the tourney at all. I didn't see any, but there sure were a lot of Premier B teams . The tourney had a new director this year. So I think it was another building year to get to know the teams. No offense to Squamish, but they aren't up to snuff with the lower mainland scene, so they don't know the teams (divisions). Perhaps they might re-format next year to even things up. Having said that, they did turn away some womens teams this year, possibly due to not enough fields I agree with the complaint about going overboard on the score, it's not the other teams fault that they were shoved into your category. However, I'm not sure what it's like to be shalacked (on the losing side of things). Last edited by SC; 05-06-2005 at 09:09 AM.