
| | #61 (permalink) |
| Member | Langley Surrey exactly as I thought it would be. Very tight with a bounce or two to settle it. I will be the last to ever make the argument that we should be better than Surrey at this point. But anyone watching the game yesterday will be hard pressed to say Surrey had it in the bag at any point past KNVB's toss. We will be heavy under dogs coming out of the valley for the forseeable future. Agree or disagree, but Valley teams will have more 0 for 4's before being anywhere close to a level playing field. Yesterdays game by far and away the most intense game we have been in all year. Simply not enough good games in a valley season to prepare us for that stage. Good luck to Surrey. Know and like enough of the guys to say I will be pulling for them going forward and look forward to seeing the game next Sunday. |
| |
| | #62 (permalink) | |
| Member | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #63 (permalink) |
| Member | [quote=Tad Hamilton]Seags got 2 yellows, pretty weak second yellow he got, but what can you do. I've noticed alot of predictions of gorge to win, but we all know it will be a great game and a battle. Predictions predictions......blah blah....both teams are going to lay it on the line. Could be a freekin boring defensive game..or an all out score-fest. All I know, is there will be no shortage or hard tackles. Lookin forward to the Van results....a few good match ups this weekend. Columbus to the final.. |
| |
| | #65 (permalink) | |
| Quote:
OK.... ![]()
__________________ Croatia 3 Wins 2 Draws 0 Loses against I-T-A-L-I-A!!!! | ||
| |
| | #66 (permalink) |
| Member | I'm not going to lie but GH needed more then Nate on the weekend to edge out Croatia. First theyneeded someone who could put the ball in the net. GH goal was brilliant, well placed shot, and Vlado created a great second oppurtunity but they didn't finish their dinner. Nate is a good keeper but they needed something other than Nate to win. |
| |
| | #67 (permalink) |
| Member | I don't know why people keep bring up the peace arch keeper being absent. It sure wasn't the keepers fault they lost. There defense looked lost, slow and just basically horrible. The keeper actually made a few nice saves. What do you want the guy to do when he is being bombarded with chance after chance. The first half was shocking really, that was a very very bad team that played the first half.
__________________ Some asshole keeps farting in my pants |
| |
| | #68 (permalink) | |
| Member | Quote:
p.s. I wish i was on crack ![]() | |
| |
| | #69 (permalink) |
| Member | [quote=Tunes] Predictions predictions......blah blah....both teams are going to lay it on the line. Could be a freekin boring defensive game..or an all out score-fest. All I know, is there will be no shortage or hard tackles. Couldn't agree more with you Tunes.. ![]() |
| |
| | #70 (permalink) |
| Member | Bully, Agree. Early on, Ryan made a few spectacular reflex saves off guys breaking in alone after easily beating the PAU sweeper. The kid was left alone, and even the league's tallest, skinniest, and shittiest golfer (needs to play w/ Dude more, and learn the way the game was meant to be played) couldn't have saved their bacon.
__________________ Om nom nom nom... |
| |
| | #72 (permalink) | |
| Member | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #73 (permalink) |
| Member | Remember the play well enough...the nice move was by the little midfielder who was getting all sorts of space on the Surrey left side of midfield. He collected the ball down near the touchline, beat the right fullback on touchline, and fed a nice hard pass / cross through the box. I believe it hit a body, and Thomo colleted the rebound, goal. I'm very certain, up to the cross, anyhow. All the "nice" skill work was done by the kid who set the platter. Anyone else? Where were you watching from, Wab? We were near half, South / East side.
__________________ Om nom nom nom... |
| |
| | #74 (permalink) | |
| Premium Member A Better Bastard | Quote:
The report on the news said it was actually an own goal so Thompson should not have even been credited with the goal. ![]() | |
| |
| | #77 (permalink) |
| Premium Member A Better Bastard | Dude, what were you smoking? The ball got played over top in which Nial beat the defender to the ball by sheilding him off, after that he took the ball in on the goalie on a very tight angle and nicley walked around him. He then tucked the ball nicley into the goal and yes it was in tight quarters. Sorry but W,A,B, pretty much called it exactly the same way. Oh yeah, it was a very nice goal.
__________________ We will miss you Horst! |
| |
| | #79 (permalink) |
| Member | So, I've been officially advise by one wig wearing Surrey United "Player" that I am, indeed, wrong. First time ever, btw. In my defense, I was busy until the wee hours of Sunday morning taking care of Utah, who was a fcuking yardsale at the bar the night before. ****ing bag of dicks; I blame him. Tell me I'm at least right about the young kid who took home Nukomb's panties down by the touchline, to set the goal up? Nukes? Comments? Help a brother out...
__________________ Om nom nom nom... |
| |