I'm really starting to become a fan of @Ronaldo. 07 because of this: he's trying to represent his squad here and he's doing it with everybody banging on about how CCB shouldn't even be in the division, as if he has control over that. His squad is in the league, he didn't place them there. The squad is green, everyone knows that. It takes experience and depth to win, everyone knows that too. So beyond that, what exactly is your point @BCSoccerWankerOuter ?
I also ALWAYS take the "should have" commentary with a grain of salt. Should have been 15-0. Fine, so why wasn't it? It wasn't for any number of reasons that get spelled out on the pitch, not on a keyboard. If they didn't put 15 past CCB, then there is a reason why. Good at parking the bus? A solid goalkeeping performance? Bad finishing by a squad that should have been more clinical? Coastal took their foot off the gas? Who knows? You rarely get truth here and unbiased reports. For once, I'd actually like to see that.
Classic examples:
~"We would have scored 1 or 2 more but we hit the post and crossbar on two shot." No, you missed the target. Close but no cigar. You didn't score that goal, bottom line.
~"Had the ref been on he would have called that PK." Well, that's ALWAYS a red hearing. Point is, it wasn't, and truth will never be consistent on that debate.
Should have and would have are excuses. I hated it in sports, and I hate it in business. Give me real reasons why you were either successful or not. Give me truth and honesty, that's actually useful.
I also ALWAYS take the "should have" commentary with a grain of salt. Should have been 15-0. Fine, so why wasn't it? It wasn't for any number of reasons that get spelled out on the pitch, not on a keyboard. If they didn't put 15 past CCB, then there is a reason why. Good at parking the bus? A solid goalkeeping performance? Bad finishing by a squad that should have been more clinical? Coastal took their foot off the gas? Who knows? You rarely get truth here and unbiased reports. For once, I'd actually like to see that.
Classic examples:
~"We would have scored 1 or 2 more but we hit the post and crossbar on two shot." No, you missed the target. Close but no cigar. You didn't score that goal, bottom line.
~"Had the ref been on he would have called that PK." Well, that's ALWAYS a red hearing. Point is, it wasn't, and truth will never be consistent on that debate.
Should have and would have are excuses. I hated it in sports, and I hate it in business. Give me real reasons why you were either successful or not. Give me truth and honesty, that's actually useful.