Welcome to the TTP community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Lord of the Rings, The Return of the King

Ballbaby

Lifetime Better Bastard
Jul 3, 2001
1,919
452
Tokens
1,240
Dirty Money
423
The movie is overrated and even today I spent a good chunk of time reminicing about how funny the little Elf girl looked with big hairy feet. God forbid I make it with an elf, the kids would be a sight! Perhaps Guinny could fill us in on how he has coped with his upbrining. :eek:
That wasn't an elf! That was a Hobbit. No wonder the likes of you and Aves didn't enjoy the show, you don't know who is who. I can picture you making it with an Elf. I can picture you making it with a Hobbit and a dwarf and an Orge for that. Don't you see? I can picture anything. It is both a curse and a blessing. I can picture what your offspring would be with each of these creatures. SC, let's be honest. Does it really matter whether you have sexual relations with an Elf or a Hobbit when really the whole point is getting off? After you're done, you shoo the creature away, and you lie back and ponder the openmindedness and simplicity of your character that would allow a Hobbit to bang you silly. Lord of he Rings exhibited the need for creatures of all sorts to forge together for one common goal. This included sexual relations. If you watched the movie in it's entirety, you wouldn' scoff at shagging an Elf or a Hobbit. This goes for Aves as well. I'm pretty sure that he thinks he is too good to shag an Elf.

BTW, I am 5'10'' and have big feet (almost like a Hobbit's) and you know what they say about that?
 

Fastshow

New Member
Jun 29, 2001
2,305
2
Tokens
0
Dirty Money
100
I love Ballbaby.........

SC said:
I guess I was a sucker for being a fan of the books, and thought my visions would come true through the 'magic' :rolleyes: of Hollywood.+SC
I don't think even the boffins in Hollywood would be able to conjure up enough magic to do any justice to your visions, SC, even your Lord of the Ring ones.
 

SC

Active Member
Jul 28, 2001
3,068
11
Tokens
2
Dirty Money
100
SC strapped for entertainment...

Crap Ballsy, I think you are exaggerating about the height, I swear you were wearing steletos or something when I met you. Please be sure to pass the DVD along when you pick it up, I'd have to see it again to understand exactly what it is you are talking about.

For the time being, I think you better down load some porn to satisfy your aggression and tension ;)


+SCwithpissallover :(
 

the manager

New Member
Sep 29, 2002
588
0
Tokens
0
Dirty Money
100
Re: SC strapped for entertainment...

SC said:

For the time being, I think you better down load some porn to satisfy your aggression and tension ;)

sadly, your suggestion would only encourage more of such unnecessary sexual imagry from ballbaby....
 

Aves

New Member
Jan 5, 2002
655
1
Tokens
0
Dirty Money
5
Ballbaby said:
Now, remember that I know numerous stories of your childhod. Weren't you seven years old when you gave some waitress shite for scewing up your order?

I was 12 and after getting a 2/3 filled sundae at Mcdonalds I asked the server why mine didn't look like the picture on the wall...with no reasonable response, she promptly filled it up...to the proper level.
Back on topic, my sundae cup was just about overflowing 20 min into two towers so I walked out instead of force myself to sit there and grow to like it, or appreciate it for the spectacle that it is...or whatever it is you were saying moviegoers should do.
That's like asking me to wait 'til the second half for you to get off the flank and into the box for a cross. ;)
I'll see you for a pint one of these wednesdays or sundays.

SC,
C'mon, you're not one of those blockbuster snobs are you?
Pearl harbour sucked, as do many others, but there are many good movies and Cold Mountain is one of them.
I spent the first 10 min thinking ..ok this is Nicole and Jude playing dress up, but the civil war setting and timeless themes of survival and the devastation of war on families and relationships hooked me.
This movie provides a context to the violence, but after 20 min of two towers, and ugly fantasy warriors ad nauseum I just had enough.
I'm sure there is a lot worth seeing in the remaing 3 hrs, but I didn't feel like sticking around to find out.
:cool:
 

SC

Active Member
Jul 28, 2001
3,068
11
Tokens
2
Dirty Money
100
I go against the grain...

Aves said:
.

SC,
C'mon, you're not one of those blockbuster snobs are you?

YUP! Only because I don't want to be like everyone else, too mainstream :eek:
 

Dude

Lifetime Better Bastard
Jul 23, 2001
16,735
4,590
Tokens
15,679
Dirty Money
1,957
All three were fcuking terrible. Like a dumb sheep, I was herded back to the 2nd and third by all the hype, with the hope of getting more storyline.

These are excellent examples of directors trying to buy our love with special effects. For 3 hour plus movies, they seemed longer...especially when a hobbit had to stop for a good cry every 15 minutes.

Who are these little queers, anyhow? Why the fcuk is the queerest of the queers the hero of these three flicks? They suck...I hate hobbits.

And yes...throw the ring in the fcuking mountain already and let me go home. Let me know when "A day in the Life of Dapotayto" gets released, and I'll check it out. That is, only if his roommate's dog co-stars.
 
I

iandmcintyre

A point that no one has made, which may help some people understand...

If you've never read/enjoyed the Lord of the Rings books don't watch the movies! It's like trying to watch a soccer game when you don't know the rules. If you don't appreciate the Science Fiction/Fantasy genre, you won't appreciate this type of movie.

I thought these were the best movies since Star Wars. I have been waiting 20 years for someone to make good movies of the LOTR books. Peter Jackson, cast, and crew did a great job!

I have heard a rumour that they may make a movie of The Hobbit, the prequel to the LOTR books. I'm looking forward to seeing this movie, too.
 

Dude

Lifetime Better Bastard
Jul 23, 2001
16,735
4,590
Tokens
15,679
Dirty Money
1,957
I find it a bit odd that you say that. It's like saying one shouldn't go to a Harry Potter movie because they've never read the J.K. Rowlings original, or that you shouldn't watch any movies based on John Grisham novels.

Rubbish...especially when it comes to the "Lord of the Rings" series, where each flick was a painful 3+ hours...they had plenty of time to tell the story.

Did we need such long battle scenes?

I tend to believe that the original books do lend more to the imagination, but if you haven't read the books, it shouldn't take anything away from the flick.
 

Bigun

Active Member
Aug 3, 2001
132
54
Tokens
85
Dirty Money
100
Still being a little tough on the final installment. Yes, it tries to do too much. Yes it is too long (an ass and bladder killer), and yes parts could have been used in one and two rather than the video game battle sequence. That said, having been immensly dissapointed at the cartoon attempts, Jackson has done a wonderful job on a nearly impossible task. Really, it needs 5 movies to do it and then we could include Bombadil, but if three were tough to do...

If you want a better version, though still without Bombadil, listen to the BBC radio drama (13hrs, 1981 I think). Absolutely marvellous.

The extended edition should be interesting since much of the cut stuff in the earlier two was excellent, and at least then I can hit pause and empty the 2 gallons of pepsi. Why did they not provide an intermission? The screen went to black at least 3 times.
 

Members online

Your TTP Wallet

Tokens
0
Dirty Money
0
TTP Dollars
$0
Top