knvb May 10, 2009 This went in, with much protest from Westside. Clearly looking for the ball. Perhaps the only call the ref got right??
This went in, with much protest from Westside. Clearly looking for the ball. Perhaps the only call the ref got right??
peter May 10, 2009 It went in, but he the WV player didn't touch the ball...clearly the ref got it wrong.
Sir M May 10, 2009 The issue isn't whether or not the WV player touched the ball or not, it is did the WV player foul Merks, no?
The issue isn't whether or not the WV player touched the ball or not, it is did the WV player foul Merks, no?
cerebral smallsy May 10, 2009 pic, in my biased eyes, shows the west van player making an attempt for the ball, (fair), but going through and making contact with merks before...well, not getting to it (unfair).
pic, in my biased eyes, shows the west van player making an attempt for the ball, (fair), but going through and making contact with merks before...well, not getting to it (unfair).
peter May 10, 2009 If he makes contact with the player before (or without) touching the ball then, yes, he fouled Merks.
If he makes contact with the player before (or without) touching the ball then, yes, he fouled Merks.
