Yer foolin yerself.... it's all aboot the numbers.Has to be on field, we play footy like Grant Fuhr played goal. Just good enough to get the win (most lof the time).
Yer foolin yerself.... it's all aboot the numbers.Has to be on field, we play footy like Grant Fuhr played goal. Just good enough to get the win (most lof the time).
punching numbers in a calculator dosent show which group is the tuffest or strongest...this site argues about those power rankings all the time it dosent prove sh*t...if you think B is better than C get the top teams together and have an exabition game...thats how youll prove the hardest group...
I agree.....We smashed the leaders of 2c 5-1!! I was actually hoping they would stay in our group again this year.
Last year means nothing...
It's the stats from this year that means something...
"C" group has the best average team ranking...
"A" has the best average overall ranking....
"B" has... er... I guess it has the Rams
Partial blame goes on the ref, too many times I see refs not giving out cards because a)they are lazy and don't want to do paper work, B) its raining and they don't want to be there any longer for extra time or c) they are in a higher level then they are fit to ref.
If refs gave out cards early and established themselves then shitty teams wouldn't continue gooning and they won't be able to field a team because to many of them are suspended!
I don't understand how they even come up with these suspensions, is there a guideline? or is it just what ever the board feels like that day?
But the lower average could contribute to having 2 very week teams coupled with a bunch of very good teams that are clsoe in talent so they don't blow each other out each week, which would explain the lower average.
Blame the referees for fights? Not for those reasons.
But the lower average could contribute to having 2 very week teams coupled with a bunch of very good teams that are clsoe in talent so they don't blow each other out each week, which would explain the lower average. I'd be very surprised if the top half of B is out after the first round of cup.
... and how stals team can keep winning (at least with him playing)...
i'd do the calcs and post them here but.... i'm too lazy...
All this means very little, because I have yet to see a quality team in this division. There are some good players, but the teams aren't very good.
Completely agree Guru. Coachmen and Arsenal from last year would dominate any of this years divisions
Arsenal have been dismal this year up in Div 1.... They're in 18th place, no wins 2 ties... They lost some players to other Div 1 and Premier teams.
ACBC picked up several new players, and have been pretty solid up near the top of Div 1. (3rd place, 1 win out of 1st)
The Coachmen picked up the cream of our last years team... 8 players, 3 of those scored a combined 43 goals last year for us. (5th place in Div 1)
Ths PM Lions lost a lot of players as well, and are in 5th in group B.
We lost all but 6 players, and are in 5th in C... to lose that many players and still be where we and the Lions are is not bad. Arsenal should have declined going up once they lost their players.
If they're that close to the Rams, I don't see any team in Div 2 being competitive in Div 1.... You have to upgrade with half a new team to compete there. As with the Coachmen and ACBC, other wise there's no point moving up.
Get yer facts straight old man.
Completely agree Guru. Coachmen and Arsenal from last year would dominate any of this years divisions (I haven't seen Whalley yet, we play them Sunday), and I don't see anyone moving up to Div.1 and being able to compete with the top half of Div.1