~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Originally posted by tiner
you are forcing me to take a calaculator any time i go to pull a root! ). ouch!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't know about you, but being an aussie (not me) shouldn't there be a better choice in words here?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
can cougars not go for older (perhaps other cougars.....) and in that case, is there still a rule to follow?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've changed my mind tiner, apparently ANYONE is fair game.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
i think the loss of innocence in the 80's could probably be attributed to big hair and flouro clothing.
Thrown off the scent: Does the pill destroy a woman's ability to pick the right man?
Alison Motluk, Guardian
Thursday February 15, 2001
It all started with a bit of harmless T-shirt sniffing. A group of
women was asked to whiff T-shirts that had been worn by a group of unknown - and unwashed - men. All they had to do was say which shirts smelled best.
The experiment, run by Claus Wedekind, a young Swiss scientist then at the University of Bern, was designed to find out if humans, like mice, use body odour to identify genetically appropriate mates. But it revealed something more worrying.
As Wedekind predicted, most female volunteers had equivalent
preferences to their rodent counterparts. Numerous studies in mice have shown that, given the choice, they sniff out mates with genes for immunity that differ from their own, and that this seems to increase their chances of producing healthy offspring. But among the volunteers there was a startling exception to this
trend. Women on the contraceptive pill showed the reverse preference.
Instead of being attracted to the scent of dissimilar men, they chose men whose genes for immunity were closest to their own.
Full text: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4136472,00.html