Captain Shamrock
Well-Known Member
The CAT system should be a pool of really good talent that is just below the Premier level. It should benefit the rich, well developed, youth aligned teams who spend alot of time on their youth (MF, SU, SYSA, Burnaby, ICSF). Combined with the U-21 league, there should be huge pool of players elevating the level of play in the VMSL/FVSL Premier leagues. It should provide a great opportunity for young players to develop that we didn't have.It's not happening and I don't really know why. A lack of loyalty with these players maybe?
I don't think you can blame youth soccer on this lack of loyalty. I think it's now part of our pop culture. It's an attitude of "if I have to work and persevere, I'll move somewhere else were it's easier". If there wasn't anywhere else to go (restrictions of movement) then maybe they would have to persevere. Nobody would or should want a restriction of movement.
I honestly think it's a lack of competitiveness in public schools/minor sports and a failure of these institutions to reward high achievers.
In saying that, the youth teams compared to the rest of Canada, prove this theory wrong.
Maybe it's a combination of things? Opportunities away from the VMSL /FVSL (university/pro)? An end of real professional talent finishing their careers in the VMSL/FVSL (old NASL players)? BCSA not producing enough good talent?
Jonesy and others,
A lot of valid points made. To be honest, it is basically a bit of 'all of the above".
Combined with the U-21 league, there should be huge pool of players elevating the level of play in the VMSL/FVSL Premier leagues. It should provide a great opportunity for young players to develop that we didn't have.
I see the U-21 league as a league for players to come out of youth and just play. The best players out of youth should be playing at the university level and/or Premier level(whether it be in the Valley or Metro). If the U-21 system was used properly, then it would be beneficial but it is not. It should provide opportunities but it doesn't. The CAT system, as I have always said is a shambles. Only certain clubs can benefit from it and even then, it is minimal. The fact that there is no unlimited subs contradicts what the CAT league should stand for. Enough on that.
I honestly think it's a lack of competitiveness in public schools/minor sports and a failure of these institutions to reward high achievers.
I don't think the lack of competitiveness is limited to just the public school system. How many provincial championships have private/Catholic schools won lately in soccer? Even WRCA joined a public league because it would give them more competition. A lot of the 'problem' in high school soccer is that a lot of the coaches just don't take it that seriously. Personally, I enjoyh that more than anything. The girls know that and they react accordingly. We take things seriously but it is a different environment for some of the metro/provincial players because their fcuking coaches scare them half to death. That is a HUGE problem. Kids are afraid to make mistakes. Look at what happened with the U-14 girls team who just won the Nationals. I believe their coach was let go AFTER winning the B.C.'s because of the aforementioned. I hope I got that info right. If not, I apologize to the coach involved. I have kids who want to play for the school team but metro coaches say they shouldn't be playing school soccer because they might get hurt. Fcuking bollocks to that. In all the teams I have played for, I still remember my two years playing soccer for Richmond High. Friends played together but more importantly worked our asses off for each other and the school. There are too many DonaMara's out there now who think they are too big for the school, and the sad thing is, a lot of coaches let them get away with it.
Another issue is the so called BC School of Excellence. These arse holes are basically telling kids if they don't train there, they can kiss their chances of playing provincially AND nationally good-bye. Bollocks to that. You see a lot of the training programs(Roman Tulis/Brad Higgs/TSS) saying that they have developed this player and that player. Bunk to that. Every kid started somewhere and these places normally take the elite player. I would like to see more 'training centers' taking kids who aren't the elite players too. If this happened more often, the overall standard of play would improve over time. Cuts are made in metro/gold/school teams but that shouldn't mean that these other kids shouldn't get a chance to improve thier play to the best of the their ability. Personally, I enjoy the challenge of working with these type of kids because they are not robots.
Finally, there are a lot of players leaving high school right now who have a one goal and that is to play college/university soccer in the States. I can't blame them. Look at the money our local universities offer to play. It doesn't even cover 1/3 of their tuition now for most of them. When I went to UBC, we received a $1400 scholarship(all players), which basically paid for our tuition. It paid for my social life during the soccer seasonbut that is another story. Our local post-secondary institutions should do whatever they can to bring the best talent to them. Unfortunately, government dictates a lot of this too.
So, Jonesy, I don't know if I have answered any questions at all but I got to let loose on a little rant and I feel a bit better. BTW, when I retired this year, we should start our own soccer academy and we'll call it "The Left Foot Soccer Academy." Think about it, we only have to train left-footed players. Granted, I know your right foot is a BIT better than minerolleyes: ), but the possibilities are endless. There is no market for left-footers right now. Think about it, Jonesy.....The Left Feet Are Us Academy....
I must go have a wank now. Cheers.
Captain
PS - Sorry about any typos or spelling errors. I'm too lazy to check.