Captain Shamrock
Well-Known Member
Willy said:Ok, I want to be as diplomatic as possible here, because I know and like the two Club I members who have posted here (in fact I like most Club I members), and I understand that we all get defensive when one of our own gets hurt … and contrary to comments made above ... no-one (not even the Idiots) likes to see anyone get hurt.
I was there, on the pitch, two steps away from the tackle when it occurred … It was a hard tackle, and the lad got hurt ... that much is true. RUFC assisted in aiding the player – with one of our players (who is a registered nurse) taking charge of treating the kid until medical help arrived.
RUFC has been on the wrong side of 3 broken legs in the past 2 seasons. We have not felt the need to burden league executives with lengthy letters …the referee was right there and a call was made … why the need to write a letter?
It all seems a bit self-righteous to me.
The reality is … both teams spent 45 minutes at their respective sidelines staying warm waiting for the Ambulance to arrive. During that time, players from Club I spent much of that time shouting threats of payback and retribution – something I’d suggest is far more (or at least equally) concerning than a tackle during the run of play.
In fact, it was concerning enough to the referee that after 45 minutes of waiting to resume play, he opted to abandon the match. Not because of the tackle, but, I believe, because of Club Ireland’s threats of violence and “payback”.
So I’m sure your Club will take decisive action against those whose un-gentlemanly conduct caused the game to be abandoned.
Glass houses ……..
(Burno and Capt - Being the devil's advocate, remember there are two sides to every story)
Willy,
You're not playing devil's advocate, as you were there. I was just reporting what I heard. Why the player in question didn't bother once to check on the injured player is beyond understanding. If he was any bit remorseful for the 'challenge', one would think he would show some concern and see how guy was doing. That didn't happen. As for the comments from Club I sidelines, let me ask you this question. If it was your brother on the other end of the tackle from say me, what would your team members have done. I'm sure they would have been shaking my hand. Like you said yourself, try the other side. How many of your players would have been happy if someone 'challenged' someone on your team like that? My guess is your glass houses comment would become moot.
Also, how come no one reported this right after the game? Was everyone waiting to see if Club I would comment first? Or it just wasn't that important. Anyway, I've said it already. It would probably be in the best interest of both clubs if the aforementioned 'tackler' stayed on the sidelines. Surely that would be the only logical thing for everyone.
As for the letter, I have no idea what the content is and nor will I ever find out. Also, the broken legs that have been received by RUFC members, were the tackles fair? If so, then letters wouldn't be appropriate. If the tackle was deemed unfair/cheap, they PERHAPS a letter is warranted. I don't know. Remember, I wasn't there, but they obviously feel strongly enough to write it. Their choice.
Perhaps Sidewinder can help with some of the comments he heard from the RUFC 'coaching staff' or sidelines...........
Hail Hail