Freestyler
Member
I ventured out to watch the Temple despite the storm. In the first 20mins DFC didn’t have it out of their own end and Temple probably should have bagged 2 or 3, but were only up 1-0. DFC responded not too long after with what was really their first shot (great finish) on net unless you wanna count their GK's punts that were carrying the entire field. Wind and rain was definitely a factor and for both teams in the first half, but I would say more so Temple who have the skill to move it around which was severly hampered. 2nd half DFC appeared to mostly stack the backline hoping for a counter-attack, by this time the rain and wind had stopped and it was just a matter of time before Temple with their ball movement popped one in and finished the game off and sure enough it came with about 25 to go. DFC did put a scare into Temple on the counter with Temple's goalie charging out to make a great save. Temple probably should have ended the game with 5 or 6.
As for the red card it was with about 15 to go and well deserved. A DFC player elbowed/kicked the Temple GK about 5 seconds after he had the ball. He protested that a Temple player had done the same in the first half but in reality it was a bit of a late effore to head the ball and the Temple players head slightly hit their GK's elbow.
As for the 10min misconduct, what kind of league is this? FVSL implement their own rules? That ref needs forced retirement.
As for the red card it was with about 15 to go and well deserved. A DFC player elbowed/kicked the Temple GK about 5 seconds after he had the ball. He protested that a Temple player had done the same in the first half but in reality it was a bit of a late effore to head the ball and the Temple players head slightly hit their GK's elbow.
As for the 10min misconduct, what kind of league is this? FVSL implement their own rules? That ref needs forced retirement.