Yes Sir M as they say you have to be good to be lucky and lucky to be good. On any other day it could have been 3 or 4-0 as laylow stated. I was expecting a more cautious approach but both teams went for it which was great to see. West Van is a solid team so it wasn't too surprising to see them regroup at the half. Only thing I will say is unless your keeper had an off day he was the only weakness but seemed to settle down a bit in the second half.
Surrey Utd/FF 2: WVFC 1. I was late arriving, so I did not see what happened in the first 30 or so, I will let laylow comment on that. But it was a very unusual result, based on the run of play that I witnessed anyway after the first 30. But if WV is going to win trophies this year, they need to overcome this type of thing.
Do I sound like Oranje?
Anyway, it was good to see Ballbaby today, always a pleasure, and nice to see some sun, as that was not going on the North Shore.
PS, wasn't this our home game?
Just wondering...Sir M.
(PS: Westside game should never have resulted in a 2-1 loss regardless of our crap performance when they dropped to 10 men).
Who to believe?
ummm, care to expand on why? what should your "crap performance" resulted in?