Guinness said:Dude doesn't know anything about winning, but he sure has ugly hair!!!
I guess the PAU loss yesterday doesn't feel as bad today... WAIT, there it comes back, I fcuking hate losing!!!
termatofylakas I don't know what park you were at but it finished 3-3. Rusty start for chilli but I give credit to Moody for there work rate. Nice to see a new young team in the league.Reece said:Huge win for the team. I'm dissapointed I couldn't come watch the game today. My prediction was off, but I still got the win right
termatofylakas said:
crafty cokcney said:Dude said:Delta packed 9 players in the box, and was completely under seige. Your coach ruined the flow of the game by completely taking advantage of the unlimited sub rule.QUOTE]
Dude,
I hate to point this out to you mate, but when you are the team that is getting dominated by the other team or "under seige" as you put it, as a coach, you must try to change the momentum or the flow. A long delay for an injury, take a yellow card, multiple substitutions, whatever it takes...
Sorry, but it seems to me that Randy did his job properly by using the sub tactic to try and change the momentum. Sometimes you win ugly, just ask the Italians or the Portuguese..
Crafty,
Understand your point, and understand Randy has a mandate to win. But, let's look at this objectively.
You are a person who, at least in the past, supported the FVSL, and the desire to improve the league as a whole. Given that it is always best to start from the top down, don't you think that there is a place in the Premier division for a sub limit? Ie: 5 during play, unlimited at half? From an objective point of view, don't you think substituting a good 30-40 times in a match is a chicken shite way to coach the game?
Sort of like how the Wops or Pork N' Cheese win: by playing like chicken shits. It has the desired effect, but who wants to see it? Know what I mean, Crafty?
Please be objective, Crafty, and if you wouldn't mind, please hit the bottle of Wild Turkey first, and post at 2:00 AM tomorrow morning, for old times sake.
Dude said:crafty cokcney said:Crafty,
Understand your point, and understand Randy has a mandate to win. But, let's look at this objectively.
You are a person who, at least in the past, supported the FVSL, and the desire to improve the league as a whole. Given that it is always best to start from the top down, don't you think that there is a place in the Premier division for a sub limit? Ie: 5 during play, unlimited at half? From an objective point of view, don't you think substituting a good 30-40 times in a match is a chicken shite way to coach the game?
Sort of like how the Wops or Pork N' Cheese win: by playing like chicken shits. It has the desired effect, but who wants to see it? Know what I mean, Crafty?
Please be objective, Crafty, and if you wouldn't mind, please hit the bottle of Wild Turkey first, and post at 2:00 AM tomorrow morning, for old times sake.
First of all, let me clarify that I do still support the FVSL and the desire to improve the league. Most of you know that I was more than a little upset after the leagues decision to scrap the CAT system, which apparently maybe reinstated next year...
However, the fact still remains the same that we as coaches must still do what we have to do to protect a lead or change the momentum or flow of the game. It is called tactics. Right, wrong, ugly or chicken shite, the win is the most important factor as a coach. I can see how the constant stopping and starting of the game with all kinds of players coming off and on the field time and time again would frustrate the hell out of the opposing team and its coaches. It would appear from the result, that the tactic our coach used, made available to him under the current rules of the league, was executed perfectly and we took the three points.
Cheers
It got weird didn't it...
